japanstrat
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2006
- Messages
- 879
- Reaction score
- 7
Seeing that the K Orville quality thing comes up all the time I thought I'd try to explain it the best I can.
You only really get what you pay for and the way some people talk about the K Orvilles you would think they were made of perf board and made in some backyard factory in Indonesia.
At the start of the K Orvilles around 1989/1990 there were the LPC-65 and SG-60 models.
They lasted until 1991.
There were also LPC-75 and SG-65 models as well.
The number is the price in yen 65 = 65,000 Yen.
The difference between the LPC-75 and LPC-65 is about $90 US depending on the exchange rate so the LPC-65 is about $90 cheaper than a LPC-75.
So if you examine a LPC-65 it might be a bit rough around the edges and same goes for the SG-60 but they are still not in the Korean price range and are all made from Mahogany.
The LPC-65 and SG-60 prices are about the same as the low end (non Korean) Tokais around 1990.
The LPC-65 explains why some of the K Orvilles have a 3 piece top (like the low end Tokais) , because of the cheaper price.
All the Orvilles are LPC-75 only from 1992.
From 1992 there are no LPC-65 models.
There are only LPC-75 models in the 1992 and 1997 catalogues and that means that both the 1992 K Orvilles and the 1997 ink stamped Orvilles are exactly the same price.
So no K Orville 3 piece tops in 1992 and 1993.
All the K Orvilles (and OBG's) from 1989 to 1993 appear to be made by Tokai and then in 1993 FujiGen gets the contract and some of the last K Orvilles appear to be made by FujiGen.
So the K Orville quality varies depending on the original selling price.
I don't know the year of my K Orville SG but I suspect I got a later year one around 1993 and that might be why it reminds me of previous FujiGen guitars I've had.
You could get a great K Orville or an average one depending on the things I've just described.
You only really get what you pay for and the way some people talk about the K Orvilles you would think they were made of perf board and made in some backyard factory in Indonesia.
At the start of the K Orvilles around 1989/1990 there were the LPC-65 and SG-60 models.
They lasted until 1991.
There were also LPC-75 and SG-65 models as well.
The number is the price in yen 65 = 65,000 Yen.
The difference between the LPC-75 and LPC-65 is about $90 US depending on the exchange rate so the LPC-65 is about $90 cheaper than a LPC-75.
So if you examine a LPC-65 it might be a bit rough around the edges and same goes for the SG-60 but they are still not in the Korean price range and are all made from Mahogany.
The LPC-65 and SG-60 prices are about the same as the low end (non Korean) Tokais around 1990.
The LPC-65 explains why some of the K Orvilles have a 3 piece top (like the low end Tokais) , because of the cheaper price.
All the Orvilles are LPC-75 only from 1992.
From 1992 there are no LPC-65 models.
There are only LPC-75 models in the 1992 and 1997 catalogues and that means that both the 1992 K Orvilles and the 1997 ink stamped Orvilles are exactly the same price.
So no K Orville 3 piece tops in 1992 and 1993.
All the K Orvilles (and OBG's) from 1989 to 1993 appear to be made by Tokai and then in 1993 FujiGen gets the contract and some of the last K Orvilles appear to be made by FujiGen.
So the K Orville quality varies depending on the original selling price.
I don't know the year of my K Orville SG but I suspect I got a later year one around 1993 and that might be why it reminds me of previous FujiGen guitars I've had.
You could get a great K Orville or an average one depending on the things I've just described.