Matsushita Selector Switch?

Tokai Forum

Help Support Tokai Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Codes so far:

26 3 (1983 ST70 with July stamps)
3N 1 (Homer found)
351 (Homer found)
341 (1983 TST60, May stamps, ATO)
29 1 (1982/83 block logo TST100MG, SN 13695, ATO)
23 2 (mystery PG off YJ)
 
So are we thinking the first digit may be the year? Or the last?
 
Makes sense that for the months that letters would be used for 10, 11, 12 (O,N, D) if only on digit holds that spot.
 
You forgot mine: 1N 3
code seems to be just like the pot date codes - 1981, November, whatever the '3' means. If true (need more samples), I think that could help us in the same way as the (usually missing) pot codes!

On older models of the switch (like the Breezys have) the number is on the Pertinax plate on the other side of the switch, much harder to decipher and taking pictures. Past the mid/late-80s it seems the switch is replaced by that white plastic sealed PCB type switch typical for the era.
 
Last edited:
The scheme isn't typical Matsushita but the N seen on a few switches doesn't allow for the YWW scheme. I want to see an O and/or D in a code before I'd feel like trusting this to some extent, but it seems to check out nicely so far.
 
Codes so far:


1N 3 (January 1982 TE70, Homer)
23 2 (mystery PG off YJ)
26 3 (1983 ST70 with June stamps)
29 1 (1982/83 block logo TST100MG, SN 13695, ATO)
341 (1983 TST60, May stamps, ATO)
351 (Homer found)
3N 1 (Homer found)
 
Last edited:
I am asking because if the first digit is the year, I may have a re-badged June 1982 ST70 instead of a 1983 TST70.

Kind of makes me take another look at the odd surface on the headstock.

IMG_4902.jpeg
IMG_1757.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7752.JPG
    IMG_7752.JPG
    215.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_7784.JPG
    IMG_7784.JPG
    156.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_7795.JPG
    IMG_7795.JPG
    214.8 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_7781.JPG
    IMG_7781.JPG
    234.2 KB · Views: 0
Yeah I wasn't ready to suggest that yet but you have an '81 serial and a June '82 switch and a June something neck/body and that decal, looks like it took them 3 years to build it :) j/k, it's certainly odd.

Do you know anything about the history of that guitar, where (country) it was sold or anything?
 
Last edited:
Actually it is a 6 digit serial number which is a Fender style number for an ST70.

SN 107628

Scan 2.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I just don't have any other comps for the 6 digits in 1982/83 to compare with.
 
Actually it is a 6 digit serial number which is a Fender style number for an ST70.

Ah yes, oops, my brain starts having dropouts after staring at the 300th guitar for the day. :) That's way more plausible but where did you get it, where did it come from and why is the headstock color around the decal so faded, do you know anything of that?
 
I don't know much about it. I got it from a guy in Miami that buys and sells a lot of guitars. He occasionally gets some really sweet Tokais. I assume he buys them from Japan, but I am not sure. It is the one with the spacers that melted so I assumed he had it stored somewhere in south Florida and it got hot. The finish looks different depending on the angle.

IMG_1758.JPG
IMG_1759.JPG
IMG_7742.JPG
IMG_3782.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1760.JPG
    IMG_1760.JPG
    203 KB · Views: 0
I am asking because if the first digit is the year, I may have a re-badged June 1982 ST70 instead of a 1983 TST70.

Kind of makes me take another look at the odd surface on the headstock.

View attachment 38387
View attachment 38391
What is going with that headstock? It looks like it's been sanded in the image but behind the decal. Little bit of tear out on the E string tuner too, are they tokai tuners?
 
I guess we also need to put the switch dates in relation with the stamps for a while to find out how long it takes for the switches to end up on a guitar/a pickguard assembly.

I can think of several possible pointless speculative theories that could explain this guitar - but alas they are pointless, no matter how plausible they may sound. :)

Do you have a UV/blacklight lamp by chance?
 
LOL.... No tear out.

IMG_8876 2.JPG

IMG_8877 2.JPG

This guitar is almost unplayed.

And it was not sanded.

IMG_8875.JPG

But now I am suspecting the decal may have been switched and the finish possibly wiped with a solvent to remove the old adhesive.

But that is only visible at an angle. In hand it looks normal.

IMG_8878.JPG

IMG_8879.JPG
 

Latest posts

Back
Top