Because the catalogues shown in the Registry don't specify type of hardware, I'm only guessing that on a LS80 it would be chrome, and nickel on the two top models. It's tough to tell on a brand new guitar because both chrome and nickel are so shiney when new. Of course, I'm sure you know about the obvious difference: that chrome has a blueish/silver caste or reflection and nickel has a more browny/yellow caste. This is really apparent when you have a chance to compare the two side by side, although even the experts have to look carefully at really shiney stuff. The best way to tell is to check your guitar again in ten years - if it still gleams, it's chrome, baby!
I posted a while back (and I don't mean to hijack your thread, Boogle) that I got tired of the really shiney chrome on my fifteen-year-old LS60, and replaced the bridge and tailpiece with nickel for a more worn-in look. The pup-covers were more of a challenge because of the unusual polepeice spacing of the Tokai PAF's. I took those covers to a metal plating shop where they discovered that they were nickel under the chrome, so they just stripped them, and I aged them. It's ironic that chrome, which will keep it's brightness forever, as opposed to nickel which tarnishes, is considered the "cheaper" of the two in the guitar world.