leadguitar_323 said:
I'm not to sure what all the fuss is about with veneer tops, it makes no difference to the sound at all on a well made guitar.
...Mick
If the Veneer is over a maple cap then I agree. But when the Veneer is used without a maple cap then it does not sound the same. Without that Maple cap a Les Paul does not sound like a Les Paul. The Maple cap is no accident. It provides good mids and a brightness that is the Les Paul sound.
I don?t think this thread is about veneer vs cost = rubbish. If anything it highlights the fact that Tokai along with most other builders have to fit veneers to get there price point.
If I fit a flame maple cap to a guitar the customer is going to pay at least a further ?400. It?s not just the cost of the wood, but the construction time.
If I had the equipment to fit a veneer (vacuum press) then it would cost and extra ?5 and look just as good.
But sound wise the Maple cap will ALWAYS sound different to a Les Paul without it. Hence why nearly all the MIJ Loverocks that do a have a veneer top , also have a maple cap. Best of both worlds.
The MIK tend to have a Veneer over the Alder with no maple cap. Place the two guitars next to each other through the same amp and if you cannot hear the differance I would suggest getting your hearing checked out :lol:
But that is not to say one is better then the other. Like I have already said, I like the sound of the MIK Alder bodied Guitars, they have that strat like resonance.