Why does my 1985 love rock has a dimple on the headstock?

Area for Tokai's older than 1985

Moderators: ian, ned

justpickin
Sus4add11
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:42 pm
Location: USA

Why does my 1985 love rock has a dimple on the headstock?

Post by justpickin » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:17 am

In the middle of the open book headstock there's a dimple..I see other that came after, and they don't have it....Can anyone explain...

marcusnieman
Guitar God
Posts: 9059
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 8:48 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Post by marcusnieman » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:05 am

I don't think the dimples were around in the 80's. Tokai produced them for their export models for copyright concerns.

justpickin
Sus4add11
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:42 pm
Location: USA

Post by justpickin » Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:56 pm

I think they where. Can anybody explain further the contrary

Check this out... http://s731.photobucket.com/albums/ww31 ... in_photos/

AlanN
Guitar God
Posts: 1070
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 7:14 pm
Location: Lancashire, UK

Post by AlanN » Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:01 pm

Can you post bigger pictures?

Also, what's the serial? Can you post a pic of the back of the headstock, and a closer pic of the front of the headstock?

justpickin
Sus4add11
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:42 pm
Location: USA

Post by justpickin » Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:10 pm

AlanN wrote:Can you post bigger pictures?

Also, what's the serial? Can you post a pic of the back of the headstock, and a closer pic of the front of the headstock?

I will when I get home. Thank you again for your replys...

marcusnieman
Guitar God
Posts: 9059
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 8:48 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Post by marcusnieman » Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:20 pm

Once again, dimples were put on the headstocks of export guitars for copyright reasons. If yours has a dimple, then that's why. If it's an 85 as you say, go to the catalog section and have a peek there.

In a prior post about your guitar, you wanted to know if you paid too much and again asked about the dimple.

If you want us to help identify what you have, then you need to provide the following pictures. Without them, it will be as frustrating to you as it is for those who are trying to help:

Front and back of headstock
Front and back of body
Underside of pickups
Body cavities and any markings after the pickups are out

justpickin
Sus4add11
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:42 pm
Location: USA

Post by justpickin » Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:35 pm

marcusnieman wrote:Once again, dimples were put on the headstocks of export guitars for copyright reasons. If yours has a dimple, then that's why. If it's an 85 as you say, go to the catalog section and have a peek there.

In a prior post about your guitar, you wanted to know if you paid too much and again asked about the dimple.

If you want us to help identify what you have, then you need to provide the following pictures. Without them, it will be as frustrating to you as it is for those who are trying to help:

Front and back of headstock
Front and back of body
Underside of pickups
Body cavities and any markings after the pickups are out
OK. Will do. Pics provided momentarily. Thanks again

marcusnieman
Guitar God
Posts: 9059
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 8:48 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Post by marcusnieman » Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:05 pm

Cool....that'll help us all see what you see and hopefully let you know what you have. If you paid a grand for an 85 LS, depending on exactly what it was, probably not bad. It's just the dimple that's throwing me off.

leadguitar_323
Guitar God
Posts: 3534
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by leadguitar_323 » Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:03 pm

Interesting, The fender style guitars had a headstock change around this time but i have never seen a "dimpled" 1985 Love rock. I was under the impression they started much later.

Mick
so many guitars....so little money...

TOKAI JOE
Guitar God
Posts: 993
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: JAPAN
Contact:

Post by TOKAI JOE » Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:42 pm

8) we all know today that the recent uk edition tokais have a dimple
but i think i remember sure that the american market edition guitars
basically all had a dimple around 1984. or from 1984. when tokai really
seemed to be expanding their sales everywhere after the 1978-1982
vintage replica golden years. i saw them w/dimple in the tokai american
catalogs from the mid 80s. not super sure but almost sure. that good
catalog site called vint-axe?..............j


http://www.vintaxe.com/menu_catalogs_electric.htm


8)

Ozeshin
Guitar God
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 11:06 pm

Post by Ozeshin » Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:38 pm

leadguitar_323 wrote:Interesting, The fender style guitars had a headstock change around this time but i have never seen a "dimpled" 1985 Love rock. I was under the impression they started much later.

Mick
But remember Mick...us Aussies have NEVER had to suffer the dimple.
For as long as we've had Tokai..and right up til today we STILL don't have the dimple on our guitars.
Obviously the long legal arm of G***** doesn't reach so far...mind you ...any more articles like the one in Australian Guitarist drwing attention to the brand may cause us some trouble down the track. :P

NWOBHM
Guitar God
Posts: 291
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:42 am

Post by NWOBHM » Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:18 am

TOKAI JOE wrote:8) we all know today that the recent uk edition tokais have a dimple
but i think i remember sure that the american market edition guitars
basically all had a dimple around 1984. or from 1984. when tokai really
seemed to be expanding their sales everywhere after the 1978-1982
vintage replica golden years. i saw them w/dimple in the tokai american
catalogs from the mid 80s. not super sure but almost sure. that good
catalog site called vint-axe?..............j


http://www.vintaxe.com/menu_catalogs_electric.htm


8)
Your right, Tokai Joe I remember them aswell ,when they were new. I own an 85' Love rock with the dimple. I got a front pic loaded to photobucket. I need to take a pic of the back of the headstock but, the serial is 5025117. Image

stratman323

Post by stratman323 » Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:27 am

Actually it's not a dimple, a dimple is concave. These additions are convex, so they should be referred to as a pimple. Or maybe a nipple. But not a dimple.

:wink:

Mike

digbystar
Guitar God
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: S.F.Bay

Post by digbystar » Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:46 am

Yeah, Yeah, I'm all for nipple!! I never wanted one of those headstock's, now I've gotta have one!!!

mirrorboy
Guitar God
Posts: 491
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 12:09 pm
Location: U.K.

Post by mirrorboy » Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:52 am

I also noticed the recent references to headstock dimples and it is technically an oxymoron as Mike has pointed out.

Pimple seems closer to the true meaning, seeing as it is undesirable to some. I think the nomenclature should have it as a 'finial', no matter how feeble, as it sits atop the apex.

Post Reply